|
How to Extend the Trump Presidency in one Easy Lesson
by lex Wednesday, Sep 5 2018, 10:28pm
international /
prose /
post
An Analysis of the NYT's Op-Ed Pretending Opposition (to Trump) by the Administration
The following analysis is the outcome of two highly specialised textual and cultural analysts. Readers would be best served if the analysis is inserted in bold text brackets of the NYT absurd and TRANSPARENT propaganda pitch itself. Indeed, the Deep State must be worried as Trump is THEIR man in office as 'his' policies so blatantly indicate, and that is why he remains president and would continue as such for some time to come. The first important factor to understand is that the New York Times (NYT) is a megaphone for the Deep State, which is widely known among professionals in the industry; it lost its former integrity as an independent media outlet more than a decade past. So what we are reading and analysing below issues directly from the Deep State itself, take note.
I Am Part of the Resistance [a word chosen intentionally as it appeals to dissidents] Inside the Trump Administration
by Anonymous -- I work for the president but like-minded colleagues and I have vowed to thwart parts of his agenda and his worst inclinations.
[Note here that the 'author/s' forfeit all INTEGRITY by hiding behind anonymity, which not only identifies the author(s) as cowards, as they are not subject to external questioning, it reveals an old propaganda trick, the 'forced' monologue/confession of one 'fearful' of losing their, (WHAT?) "job" -- give the world a break, you rank amateurs.
Now let's make a REAL historical comparison with the same type of circumstance/predicament and the alleged 'fearful' sentiment.
Henry Kissinger was both Sec. of State and Defense for Nixon and he had no problem whatsoever informing the public that when (alcoholic) Nixon was tanked up on his spirit of choice he would issue all manner of ill-considered commands INCLUDING nuking North Vietnam during that war. Kissinger outwardly spoke of ignoring those orders and obfuscating the reasons to Nixon, he had no tendency whatsoever to disguise that FACT. Administrations have ALWAYS thwarted certain policies and orders from presidents, it's an historical fact of life, and therefore this anonymous author loses all credibility for not standing up and making it publicly known that due to his/her/their concerns he would gladly lose his job to save the nation, you see?]
The Times today is taking the rare step of publishing an anonymous Op-Ed essay. We have done so at the request of the author, a senior official in the Trump administration whose identity is known to us and whose job would be jeopardized by its disclosure. We believe publishing this essay anonymously is the only way to deliver an important perspective to our readers. We invite you to submit a question about the essay or our vetting process here. [Do not follow this embedded link if you value your freedom -- it is a classic 'phishing' attempt.]
President Trump is facing a test [Really? Most of it is staged to distract from the sordid machinations of the Deep State. The media remains in a frenzy over Trump, but ASK who OWNS the mass media in America? It is simply an arm of the Deep State] to his presidency unlike any faced by a modern American leader.
It’s not just that the special counsel looms large [he would if he worked at speed (the NSA has ALL the goods necessary to remove Trump from office) but Mueller seems intent on prolonging Trump's tenure in office.] Or that the country is bitterly divided [True, hence the NEED to PLACATE.] over Mr. Trump’s leadership. Or even that his party might well lose the House to an opposition hellbent on his downfall. [A not so subtle pitch for the Republicans.]
The dilemma — which he does not fully grasp — is that many of the senior officials in his own administration are working diligently from within to frustrate parts of his agenda and his worst inclinations. [As stated above, nothing new, BUT it is pitched as something new; again, in order to PLACATE.]
I would know. I am one of them. [Are you indeed? Then stand upright, make an issue of it and be honored by the nation/people!]
To be clear, ours is not the popular “resistance” [that word again] of the left. We want the administration to succeed [Now that is truly a laugh from one or more traitorous cowards secretly opposed to the president.] and think that many of its policies have already made America safer and more prosperous.
But we believe our first duty is to this country, and the president continues to act in a manner that is detrimental to the health of our republic. [Then openly revolt and gain huge support to remove Trump from office.]
That is why many Trump appointees have vowed to do what we can to preserve our democratic institutions while thwarting Mr. Trump’s more misguided impulses until he is out of office. [More obvious crap.]
The root of the problem is the president’s amorality. Anyone who works with him knows he is not moored to any discernible first principles that guide his decision making. [As above, REVOLT openly.]
Although he was elected as a Republican, the president shows little affinity for ideals long espoused by conservatives: free minds, free markets and free people. At best, he has invoked these ideals in scripted settings. At worst, he has attacked them outright.
In addition to his mass-marketing of the notion that the press is the “enemy of the people,” President Trump’s impulses are generally anti-trade and anti-democratic. [Do you call a modern American surveillance State democratic, you clowns?]
Don’t get me wrong. There are bright spots that the near-ceaseless negative coverage of the administration fails to capture: effective deregulation, historic tax reform, a more robust military and more. [Sales pitch for the Deep State.]
But these successes have come despite — not because of — the president’s leadership style, which is impetuous, adversarial, petty and ineffective. [Yet all Trump's major policies serve the Deep State and American elites.]
From the White House to executive branch departments and agencies, senior officials will privately admit their daily disbelief at the commander in chief’s comments and actions. Most are working to insulate their operations from his whims.
Meetings with him veer off topic and off the rails, he engages in repetitive rants, and his impulsiveness results in half-baked, ill-informed and occasionally reckless decisions that have to be walked back. [Then lobby to remove him though he continues to serve your and his elite masters.]
“There is literally no telling whether he might change his mind from one minute to the next,” a top official complained to me recently, exasperated by an Oval Office meeting at which the president flip-flopped on a major policy decision he’d made only a week earlier.
The erratic behavior would be more concerning if it weren’t for unsung heroes in and around the White House. Some of his aides have been cast as villains by the media. But in private, they have gone to great lengths to keep bad decisions contained to the West Wing, though they are clearly not always successful.
It may be cold comfort in this chaotic era, but Americans should know that there are adults [Cowardly slaves to the elite.] in the room. We fully recognize what is happening. And we are trying to do what’s right even when Donald Trump won’t.
The result is a two-track presidency.
Take foreign policy: In public and in private, President Trump shows a preference for autocrats and dictators, such as President Vladimir Putin of Russia and North Korea’s leader, Kim Jong-un, [Which CIA Pompeo arranged with Kim and Bolton arranged with Putin.] and displays little genuine appreciation for the ties that bind us to allied, like-minded nations.
Astute observers have noted, though, that the rest of the administration is operating on another track, one where countries like Russia are called out for meddling and punished accordingly, and where allies around the world are engaged as peers rather than ridiculed as rivals. [Trump was clearly sent on a weapons sales mission (by whom?) and only partially succeeded.]
On Russia, for instance, the president was reluctant to expel so many of Mr. Putin’s spies as punishment for the poisoning of a former Russian spy in Britain [Unsubstantiated to this day and already exposed as a frame/false flag.] He complained for weeks about senior staff members letting him get boxed into further confrontation with Russia, and he expressed frustration that the United States continued to impose sanctions on the country for its malign behavior. But his [traitorous.] national security team knew better — such actions had to be taken, to hold Moscow accountable. [For more unsubstantiated propaganda.]
This isn’t the work of the so-called deep state. [Yes, it is!] It’s the work of the steady state. [LOL]
Given the instability many witnessed, there were early whispers within the cabinet of invoking the 25th Amendment, which would start a complex process for removing the president. But no one wanted to precipitate a constitutional crisis. [Gutless, when it's necessary it has to be done.] So we will do what we can to steer the administration in the right direction until — one way or another — it’s over.
The bigger concern is not what Mr. Trump has done to the presidency but rather what we as a nation have allowed him to do to us. [You got that right, amazing!] We have sunk low with him and allowed our discourse to be stripped of civility. [Indeed you have, gutless wonders.]
Senator John [bomb, bomb, bomb Iran, nutter] McCain put it best in his farewell letter. All Americans should heed his words and break free of the tribalism trap, with the high aim of uniting through our shared values and love of this great nation. [Then DO IT, anonymous talk is cheap as shit.]
We may no longer have Senator McCain. But we will always have his example [As an insane war hawk.] — a lodestar for restoring honor to public life and our national dialogue. [Deep state media monologue, you mean.] Mr. Trump may fear such honorable men, but we should revere them. [Ridiculous!]
There is a quiet [Too quite -- lol.] resistance within the administration of people choosing to put country first. But the real difference will be made by everyday citizens rising above politics, reaching across the aisle and resolving to shed the labels in favor of a single [Fascism] one: Americans.
The writer is [A rank amateur propagandist] a senior [and gutless] official in the Trump administration.
Copyright applies to external text.
[In conclusion, it should now be clear that the NYT piece is blatant propaganda designed to placate a troubled public; read it again, it essentially says don't worry about Trump 'we' are safeguarding the nation -- in other words Trump, the puppet of the Deep State, remains in office, much to everyone's chagrin. Don't believe a word of it, continue to disrupt and dissent against elites and a captured government.
Postscript:
We have recently noticed that various news sites, mainstream AND alternative, are taking the NYT propaganda piece at face value, as authentic in other words. This is NOT an authentic piece, it is fake to its very core. Any first year media studies student could inform these luminaries in the alternative media to NEVER TAKE ANY MEDIA PRODUCTION as a 'GIVEN.' Always question its source and why/how it was written and to what end/purpose, while always considering the prevailing cultural context. If these alternative news journos had a half a brain they would follow these simple precautions/instructions as any real PROFESSIONAL would before leaping head first into an orchestrated propaganda spiel that is clearly designed to maintain the Trump presidency -- but it's okay remember, the secret traitorous group is saving the country -- well, my ass to that! Now wake up to yourselves you alternative news 'luminary' dimwits before you lose what little is left of your credibility.]
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/05/opinion/trump-white-house-anonymous-resistance.html
<< back to stories
|
printable version
PDF version
